<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A better alternative to brainstorming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitsite.com/blog/2008/12/a-better-alternative-to-brainstorming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitsite.com/blog/2008/12/a-better-alternative-to-brainstorming/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: How to better manage your brainstorming sessions? at Innovation by SIT</title>
		<link>http://www.sitsite.com/blog/2008/12/a-better-alternative-to-brainstorming/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>How to better manage your brainstorming sessions? at Innovation by SIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitsite.com/blog/?p=128#comment-353</guid>
		<description>[...] But does it really work? Do the nice ideas of cross-fertilization among team members and suspense of judgment really deliver? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But does it really work? Do the nice ideas of cross-fertilization among team members and suspense of judgment really deliver? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Plishka</title>
		<link>http://www.sitsite.com/blog/2008/12/a-better-alternative-to-brainstorming/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Plishka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitsite.com/blog/?p=128#comment-309</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with the concept of the Time's article.  I have been blogging (just did this one the other day: http://zenstorming.wordpress.com/2009/01/22/reasons-brainstorming/ ) and teaching alternatives to brainstorming, not just because research shows it isn't efficient, but because I've seen results that blow away typical brainstorming when implementing a few changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with the concept of the Time&#8217;s article.  I have been blogging (just did this one the other day: <a href="http://zenstorming.wordpress.com/2009/01/22/reasons-brainstorming/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/http://zenstorming.wordpress.com/2009/01/22/reasons-brainstorming/');" rel="nofollow">http://zenstorming.wordpress.com/2009/01/22/reasons-brainstorming/</a> ) and teaching alternatives to brainstorming, not just because research shows it isn&#8217;t efficient, but because I&#8217;ve seen results that blow away typical brainstorming when implementing a few changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nir gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.sitsite.com/blog/2008/12/a-better-alternative-to-brainstorming/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>nir gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitsite.com/blog/?p=128#comment-276</guid>
		<description>Dear Fabian,

Answering your first question - on how to do it almost anonymosly - we call it in S.I.T "Opportunistic Innovation". 

As you mentioned, most organizations still use brainstorming as their main method, and so are not neccesarily familiar with the possibility of "brain SITorming" as you call it. 

So what can readers of this blog do, when they happen to sit in a regular brainstorming session, that is stuck, and is going no where, and are certain that using an SIT tool here, 'annonymously' can help 'unstuck' the session?

They can use "Opportunistic Innovation". What is it?

Basicaly this means doing SIT undercover, or as a client who is also a close friend of us, an SIT coach in Bayer, calls it: "Stealth S.I.T."

How is done?

I will give you some possibilities:
* Doing it during a meeting "In your mind" 1: Use Subtraction to raise questions that will help others overcome other participants’ fixedness and blocks. Think of ways to lead the conversation to what amounts to applying the tool, without actually using the SIT language. For example: "What if we considered not having an XYZ in this ZZ?". Generate Virtual Products in your mind and then ask for benefits and challenges.
* Doing it during a meeting "In your mind" 2: Lead the conversation according to the FFF chart. E.g. “Wait, lets think first what could be the value of this.”, and then “Now that we realize what it can do for us, let's see if we can implement it.”

* And now, if you started from an “in your mind” approach, and if your idea was received with enthusiasm, use the opportunity to admit that you have a method, and volunteer to present it: "Give me 5 minutes to introduce you to an interesting concept that I think we can use here.” then very briefly teach the tool or principle you want to use and apply it with the team;
 - Dont forget to assign roles; make sure you have someone who knows about the subject enough and a scribe to capture ideas as they come; collect ideas and document them.

Even when you are doing Stealth SIT, and it’s going well, make sure you don’t take over the meeting. Much better that they ask you for more later or next time. 

And another suggestion: Share your experiences of opportunistic innovation with your fellow “closet innovators”, learn and teach, grumble together when it doesn’t work out, and share the joy when it does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Fabian,</p>
<p>Answering your first question - on how to do it almost anonymosly - we call it in S.I.T &#8220;Opportunistic Innovation&#8221;. </p>
<p>As you mentioned, most organizations still use brainstorming as their main method, and so are not neccesarily familiar with the possibility of &#8220;brain SITorming&#8221; as you call it. </p>
<p>So what can readers of this blog do, when they happen to sit in a regular brainstorming session, that is stuck, and is going no where, and are certain that using an SIT tool here, &#8216;annonymously&#8217; can help &#8216;unstuck&#8217; the session?</p>
<p>They can use &#8220;Opportunistic Innovation&#8221;. What is it?</p>
<p>Basicaly this means doing SIT undercover, or as a client who is also a close friend of us, an SIT coach in Bayer, calls it: &#8220;Stealth S.I.T.&#8221;</p>
<p>How is done?</p>
<p>I will give you some possibilities:<br />
* Doing it during a meeting &#8220;In your mind&#8221; 1: Use Subtraction to raise questions that will help others overcome other participants’ fixedness and blocks. Think of ways to lead the conversation to what amounts to applying the tool, without actually using the SIT language. For example: &#8220;What if we considered not having an XYZ in this ZZ?&#8221;. Generate Virtual Products in your mind and then ask for benefits and challenges.<br />
* Doing it during a meeting &#8220;In your mind&#8221; 2: Lead the conversation according to the FFF chart. E.g. “Wait, lets think first what could be the value of this.”, and then “Now that we realize what it can do for us, let&#8217;s see if we can implement it.”</p>
<p>* And now, if you started from an “in your mind” approach, and if your idea was received with enthusiasm, use the opportunity to admit that you have a method, and volunteer to present it: &#8220;Give me 5 minutes to introduce you to an interesting concept that I think we can use here.” then very briefly teach the tool or principle you want to use and apply it with the team;<br />
 - Dont forget to assign roles; make sure you have someone who knows about the subject enough and a scribe to capture ideas as they come; collect ideas and document them.</p>
<p>Even when you are doing Stealth SIT, and it’s going well, make sure you don’t take over the meeting. Much better that they ask you for more later or next time. </p>
<p>And another suggestion: Share your experiences of opportunistic innovation with your fellow “closet innovators”, learn and teach, grumble together when it doesn’t work out, and share the joy when it does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabian Szulanski</title>
		<link>http://www.sitsite.com/blog/2008/12/a-better-alternative-to-brainstorming/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabian Szulanski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitsite.com/blog/?p=128#comment-274</guid>
		<description>Great point, and great article,
I've got a question: As most organizations are still sticking to brainstoming, we should slowly lead them to embrace 'SITstorming'. Apart from increasing their awareness, how should we design a session so that people would add value 'almost anonymously' without witholding their worst or best virtual products? And how should we nurture an energetic meeting climate, knowing that innovation is not always fun, but at the same time folks are used to have fun in **stoming sessions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point, and great article,<br />
I&#8217;ve got a question: As most organizations are still sticking to brainstoming, we should slowly lead them to embrace &#8216;SITstorming&#8217;. Apart from increasing their awareness, how should we design a session so that people would add value &#8216;almost anonymously&#8217; without witholding their worst or best virtual products? And how should we nurture an energetic meeting climate, knowing that innovation is not always fun, but at the same time folks are used to have fun in **stoming sessions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
