This month’s LAB features a former student of mine, Ryan Rosensweig. Ryan is the first business-design hybrid from the University of Cincinnati’s College of Design, Architecture, Art, and Planning. He earned his master’s degree in design after completing his bachelor’s degree in marketing, sustainable urban engineering, and interdisciplinary design innovation. As the graduate assistant for Associate Dean Craig M. Vogel, of DAAP’s Center for Design Research and Innovation, Ryan researched educational models for interdisciplinary innovation, the interaction between design methodologies and business strategy.
Take a look at his portfolio here.
I had the pleasure of teaching Ryan how to use Systematic Inventive Thinking when he attended my Innovation Tools graduate course. The final exam required students to correctly apply all five techniques of S.I.T. to an item assigned to them randomly.
Let’s look at Ryan’s final exam – innovating a couch!
2. MULTIPLICATION: Making a copy of a component but changing it in some way
4. DIVISION: Dividing a product or component either physically, functionally, or preserving (maintaining characteristics of the whole)
5. ATTRIBUTE DEPENDENCY: Creating (or breaking) dependencies between two internal attributes or an internal and external attribute.
People often ask when is the best time to innovate: early in the pipeline process,…
At SIT, we don’t subscribe to the notion that “there’s no such thing as a…
What if the biggest breakthrough wasn’t about adding more, but stripping something away? Pillsbury’s refrigerated…
When it comes to innovation, most people assume that more freedom equals more creativity. Blank…
Innovation is a skill, not a gift. Top organizations drive growth by nurturing and investing…
Are you in the world of problem solving? Is problem solving a skillset you have…
View Comments
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good. https://www.binance.com/bg/join?ref=FIHEGIZ8
I don't think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.
Can you be more specific about the content of your article? After reading it, I still have some doubts. Hope you can help me.
Reading your article has greatly helped me, and I agree with you. But I still have some questions. Can you help me? I will pay attention to your answer. thank you.
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good.