Categories: Uncategorized

Funding Innovation

Mitch Ditkoff takes on the all important issue of how to fund innovation, and writes about innovation slush funds as a way improve innovation results:

What I like about this approach is that it sidesteps the bureaucratic hokey pokey, run-it-up-the-flagpole, command and control, funky chicken shuffle that all too often scuttles powerful new ideas in need of a timely infusion of capital to get them rolling.

From my experience, there are two choices in how to fund innovation:  invention or development.  Invention means the actual genesis of the idea, usually through a concentrated effort or workshop using a proven method.  Development is what you do with the ideas that have commercial merit.  Both take time and money.  The choice depends on whether you think spending the money to generate ideas will yield more than a pool of funds to invest the ideas that you already have.
Fortune 100 companies vary widely in how they approach it.  Some invest in idea generation to create large stocks of potential opportunities.  They invest in innovation teams and processes to keep innovation happening day in and day out.  The ideas generated must compete for resources against the rest of the portfolio of opportunities.  The other approach is to create a bounty like what Mitch has described…a slush fund to motivate and lure the creative people to come up with ideas.
My preference is to fund invention, systematically.  My sense is that employees need to feel there are sufficient resources and sufficient time for them to take the risk of ideating.  By investing in the ideation process, employees feel liberated to give it their all.  I think the idea of a slush fund makes sense if it is used for pure ideation.   Tell people there are dollars available to conduct formal ideation workshops…a slush fund…and they will beat a path to your door.  That’s what I do.   As Mitch puts it:

And remember, as one wise pundit put it, “It’s not the money that starts the idea, it’s the idea that starts the money.”

Fund ideation, and the result will yield more funds.

boydadmin

View Comments

  • I also like the way that Google not only allows, but encourages strongly, that 20% of your time be spent on employee self-directed projects. Each month, the best of these in each group is celebrated, as well as best company-wide.

  • Good post Drew. Scarcity of time, money and talent dictate the choice between invention development or actually product/process development (based on the conceptualized idea). We (at ideabobber.com ) are trying to facilitate that transfer of ideas from "invention" oriented folks to action-oriented folks like entrepreneurs etc.

Recent Posts

Innovation Behavior

Innovation is a skill, not a gift.  Top organizations drive growth by nurturing and investing…

3 months ago

Should you learn TRIZ? – Yes. ….and No.

Are you in the world of problem solving?  Is problem solving a skillset you have…

3 months ago

What Lies Ahead in 2024?

5 Data-Driven, Customer-Centric trends we’ve identified This is not just another conventional forecast. Over nearly…

3 months ago

Fork or Chopsticks – Which Innovation Tools Do You Use?

Imagine a chef, who only uses a spoon. Imagine a dentist, who only uses a…

4 months ago

The Moat Mentality: Exploring New Frontiers in Innovation Methodologies

In investing and business strategy, we often speak in terms of moats. Warren Edward Buffett…

4 months ago

Was it a Breakthrough or an Adjacency?

This year, P&G’s Febreze celebrates its silver anniversary as a brand. But not all 25…

4 months ago