Посты с тэгом: structured innovation

Innovation for the Non-Profit Sector

Published date: January 17, 2011 в 3:00 am

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,,

Non-profit organizations need innovation every bit as much as for-profit firms.  Some might argue they need it more because they lack the resources and cash flow of large commercial firms.  Non-profits need innovation in:

  • Fund Raising
  • Expanding their reach
  • Mission delivery
  • Resource utilization

The need for innovation in the non-profit sector is widely recognizedAwards, grants, and other forms of recognition for innovative programs help stimulate managers to be more aggressive.

While the need is recognized, the approach to innovating non-profits is not.  These organizations should use the same methods found so effective in corporate innovation.  Structured methods based on patterns inherent in inventive solutions can be applied to the non-profit business model just as effectively as the for-profit model.  A method like S.I.T. can help an organization “break fixedness” about its role, resources, and process, thus opening new possibilities and approaches.

Here is how I would do it.  Start by making a list of the components of the non-profit, both internal to the firm as well as external.  The list might include:

  1. the office
  2. volunteers
  3. phones
  4. fund raising events
  5. website
  6. promotional material
  7. donations and grants
  8. beneficiaries
  9. benefactors
  10. mission statement
  11. management board
  12. executive director

Start with a tool like Subtraction.  Try removing an essential internal component (for example, donations and grants).  Use “Function Follows Form” to imagine benefits and uses of all the remaining components.  Try it with other components.  Next, use the Task Unification tool.  This tool helps you see existing resources in a new light, usually creating innovative ways to use those resources.  Finish the exercise with one of the three remaining tools.  Division, for example, will likely create new configurations of the non-profit and stimulate innovative ideas.  For example, try dividing out some of the executive director’s roles but placing them somewhere else back in the “Closed World.”  Where would those roles go and why would that be beneficial?

Here are some creative examples from the non-profit sector (courtesy of PSFK):

  1. Nonprofit Shopping Mall is a new service that turns consumer dollars into charitable donations. The organization partners with major online retailers like Target, Amazon, Home Depot, Bloomingdales, Expedia, Petco, and iTunes.  They donate a percentage of each purchase to the nonprofit of choice.  A shopper begins on Nonprofit Shopping Mall, choosing a charity and clicking through to a retailer. Tracking data is used to identify which shoppers came via Nonprofit Shopping Mall, and which charities they’ve chosen to donate to.
  2. Holiday Matinee recently worked with a local, non-profit charter school-offering its students an opportunity to design their own silkscreen tees, which they then voted on which designs to take part in their Artist Series. 100% of all the proceeds from these shirts go to school funding.
  3. Can Too is an Australian non-profit program that provides professional training in running and swimming in exchange for charitable fund raising. Members are given twice-weekly training sessions, daily guides, speakers and social events.  In return, they have to raise funds for Cure Cancer Australia. Runners can train for 10K or half marathon and full marathon events while swimmers can choose from among 1 km, 2 km and 2.7 km ocean swims and raise funds when they participate in their respective events. Can Too has raised more than AUD 4 million for Cure Cancer Australia.
  4. The MarkProf Foundation is a non-profit organization in Manila.  Its main event is an all-expenses paid, seven week “boot camp” led by multinational CEOs and reputable captains of local industry. Participants from diverse socio-economic backgrounds are ranked based on two core virtues: innovation and inquisitiveness.  The proof of success is in quality job creation. “MarkProf is already the biggest source of management trainees for some of the top multinational companies in the Philippines” says current president, Jem Perez who also refers to the organization as a “resume equalizer”.

The Voice of Serendipity

Many products are invented accidentally.  Serendipity led to the microwave oven, corn flakes, Teflon®, penicillin, fireworks, Viagra®, chocolate chip cookies, and the most famous of all accidents…the Post-it® note.  The problem with serendipity is it’s not predictable.  It is not an innovation method one would count on for corporate  growth.  But there is value in serendipity if you can unlock its hidden secrets.  How?

In 1891, a physical education teacher named James Naismith invented the game of basketball by nailing two peach baskets to the gymnasium walls.  After the ball was thrown into a basket, someone climbed a ladder to get it out.  This was annoying, so the bottom of the basket was altered to allow a stick to poke through and knock the ball out.  After many games and many successful shots, the bottom fell out…literally.  The peach basket bottom weakened and broke loose allowing a ball to fall completely through after a shot.  The result?  This simple, serendipitous invention allowed the game to be played continuously without the interruption of retrieving the ball.  Basketball advanced to the worldwide game that it is today.

The LAB: Innovating Water Access in Developing Countries (May 2010)

 Shortage of water may become a more catastrophic problem than food or energy shortage according to experts.  The problem affects developing as well as developed countries including the U.S..  For this month’s LAB, we will look at how the corporate innovation method, S.I.T., can be used to address such a serious issue.  The following ideas were developed by students at the University of Cincinnati working on the PUR water filtration system from Procter & Gamble.  They are excellent examples of purpose-driven innovation.  You can download the team’s complete portfolio here.

Pur trek open 1.  TASK UNIFICATION (assigning an additional job to an existing resource):  Hikers and campers can now experience PUR Trek and the confidence of having filtered water at all times anywhere they go. These 16-oz, single-serving, disposable, portable, and easy to carry drink containers offer a flat design for minimal storage, with easy-to- expand, biodegradable Tetra Pak inspired material.  For quick filling at a stream or other water source, the open top design allows the user to quickly scoop up the cool unfiltered water.  Then as the user drinks from the active filtering spout, all sediment and harmful particles are left behind in the bottom of the container.  Consumers can count on one disposable container to last up to 10 days, and they can be purchased individually or in 10- packs.

2.  MULTIPLICATION (making copies of a component but changing it):  The PUR-2-Go is PUR’s latest product targeting the needs of busy students and singles. Its two compartment pitcher is easily filled through PUR’s new electronic filter system. Integrated in the lid, this new filter works so fast that it filters instantly and makes a holding compartment in the pitcher unnecessary. The two compartments of the pitcher easily break in two. The bigger compartment can stay in the kitchen while the smaller compartment transforms into a reusable bottle of water to go.  This makes the use of bottled water unnecessary because the PUR-2-Go is just as easy to handle and quick to use. This grab and go usability of the PUR-2-Go makes it more convenient for everybody to commit to a greener lifestyle.

The LAB: Innovating a Party with P.I.G. (March 2010)

Published date: March 22, 2010 в 2:00 am

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,,,

Here is a new iPhone application that uses the structured innovation method, S.I.T., to create ideas for your next party.  The Party Idea Generator, P.I.G., leads you through a series of steps to trigger original party ideas.  It has ten different ways to start inventing, and you can add more.  It also has over 150 pre-generated triggers and ideas to get you moving.  My favorite feature is the special “Huh?” button in case you get stuck.  If you want to learn the essence of structured innovation, try this app.  It is both fun and useful.
Here is a description on YouTube:

For this month’s LAB, we will use P.I.G. to create ideas for my next party.  Here are five ideas, each described by the Component of the party, the “valve” that I selected (either “Less” or “More”), and the Trigger Statement.  Then I try to describe potential benefits of each hypothetical “solution.”

Component:  Dancing

  • Valve:  “Less.”
  • Trigger:  “You will have a dinner party with no dance floor; your guests can dance but only in their seats.  If you’re not sitting, no dancing is allowed.”
  • Potential benefits:  This would be useful for people with limited mobility.  Having people dance while sitting next to each other might promote more intimacy.  Another benefit is that people can eat and drink more efficiently if they are seated.

Component:  Music

  • Valve:  “More”
  • Trigger:  “Imagine the DJ changes music in the middle of the song.  What would be the influence of this change?”
  • Potential benefits:  Perhaps this sudden change is a signal to guests to do something such as find another partner.  Perhaps it is a game of some sort where only certain people can dance to certain music.

Component:  Restroom

  • Valve:  “Less
  • Trigger:  “Can you imagine a party where there are no restrooms?  What can you do so that you and your guests won’t have to hold it?”
  • Potential benefits:  I had to hit the “Huh?” button on this one, and here are the questions it posed:  “Can you think of variations of this idea?”  What is so interesting about this idea?”  “Is this idea to crazy for you?  Tone it down to suit your style.”  What is interesting about this idea is that it might limit how much alcohol people drink and how long they stay at the party.  For certain events where you want to celebrate in a short period of time, this would be really useful.

Component:  Drink

  • Valve:  “More”
  • Trigger:  “At your party, drinking is not taken lightly.  When your guest orders a drink, they will get a second drink with a higher proof of alcohol that the one they ordered.  It is their choice to drink it or give it to a friend.”
  • Potential Benefits:  This will certainly accelerate the social lubrication aspect of drinking alcohol.  Perhaps it is a way for guest to try different cocktails.  Perhaps there is a theme to each drink around the main theme of the party.  Perhaps it is just an efficient way to make sure everyone has a fresh drink in their hand by having guests take the extra drink to someone who is empty.

Component:  Gifts

  • Valve:  “Less”
  • Trigger:  “At your party, you are not receiving tangible gifts, but you are still getting something that you can benefit from.  How is this possible?  What can you get instead of a gift?”
  • Potential benefits:  Non-tangible gifts could include advice, referrals, feedback, encouragement, cheerfulness, laughter, information, insight, and compliments.

The LAB: Innovating the Hockey Stick with Attribute Dependency (September 2009)

Published date: September 28, 2009 в 5:00 am

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,,,,

Lab_2

Ice hockey is big business.  But it lags behind other professional sports – soccer, football, baseball, and basketball.  As with all industries, the key to growth is innovation.  Equipment manufacturers such as Reebok are taking this seriously with the creation of the Hockey Research and Innovation Center.  In this month’s LAB, we will focus on the equipment side of hockey, specifically on: the hockey stick.

Hockey has been around a long time with evidence of its origins dating to the sixteenth century.  The first organized indoor game was played in 1875. Since then, many innovations have been introduced.  Let’s see how a systematic, corporate innovation method can be applied to drive new sales opportunities.

I used the Attribute Dependency template of Systematic Inventive ThinkingAttribute Dependency differs from the other templates in that it uses attributes (variables) of the situation rather than components.  Start with an attribute list, then construct a 2 x 2 matrix of these, pairing each against the others.  Each cell represents a potential dependency (or potential break in an existing dependency) that forms a Virtual Product.  Using Function Follows Form, we work backwards and envision a potential benefit or problem that this hypothetical solution solves.

Here is my attribute list:

Get our innovation model that has worked for 1000+ companies.

    No thanks, not now.