Посты с тэгом: SIT

Innovation: Make It Someone Else’s Problem

Published date: September 5, 2011 в 3:00 am

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,,,

New research suggests that you are likely to be more creative when you imagine the problem is someone else’s instead of your own.  Evan Polman and Kyle Emich describe their studies in their April 2011 article that support this conclusion.

In one study, 262 participants were instructed to draw an alien for a story that they would write, or alternatively for a story that someone else would write. When drawing an alien for someone else’s story, they produced a more creative alien. In another study, 137 students were instructed to picture either themselves or a stranger stuck in a tower and to think of a way to escape using only a rope that did not reach the ground. Of the students who imagined a stranger in the tower, 66 percent found the solution—divide the rope lengthwise and tie the pieces together—compared with 48 percent of those who pictured themselves in the tower.

For innovation practitioners, teachers, and consultants, this research suggests a new technique to improve innovation output. When using an innovation method or problem solving technique, participants should try to image the problem is not theirs.  Instead, they want to mentally simulate the problem belongs to someone else.  One way to do this is to have participants imagine they are innovating for a similar issue but in a different industry.  As an exercise, have participants apply a technique in this scenario first as a way to activate and expand their creative output.  Only then, have them apply the same mental structure to their actual problem.

Here is an example.  Imagine you are facilitating a team that makes diagnostic equipment for automobiles. They want to innovate new ways to use the data that is collected by their equipment.  You are about to apply the S.I.T. Subtraction Technique (remove an essential component).  Normally, you would have the team apply Subtraction by eliminating the vehicle data entirely – a great way to break functional fixedness.

Now, in light of this new research, here is what you might do instead.  Tell the team they are in a different industry – medical diagnostics – but that they are not allowed to use any traditional diagnostic tests on their patients (like blood tests, x-rays, vitals, etc).  Ask them, “What would you do now to get useful data about your patients?”  After a round of ideation, have them re-do the exercise back on their own problem.  Mentally imagining the problem to be someone else’s first will boost creative output on their own problem.

Polman, E., & Emich, K. J. (2011). Decisions for Others Are More Creative Than Decisions for the Self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(4), 492-501.

Photo by permission: www.cartoonstock.com

The LAB: Innovating Software Applications with S.I.T. (August 2011)

Published date: August 29, 2011 в 3:00 am

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,,,

Lab_2
Software runs much of our lives.  It runs everyday items like computers, automobiles, banking, telephones, and even kitchen appliances.  Software will affect more of our daily routines in the future. According to market researcher DataMonitor, the global software market will grow to $457 billion, an increase of 50.5% since 2008.

The problem with software is you cannot see it.  The term was coined originally as a prank to contrast the term, “hardware.” Unlike hardware, software is intangible – it cannot be touched.  So how do you innovate software especially with a corporate innovation method like S.I.T.?  This method uses the components of the product or service as the starting point.  Companies sometimes struggle creating new applications because software seems too abstract.

The secret to using S.I.T. on software is this.  Don’t innovate the software code; rather, use the innovation method on what the software does.  Apply the method to the products and processes that the software affects.  This will create new-to-the-world innovations.  Then, write the software code that implements these new applications.

Here is an example with the software program, Quicken.  We start with a component list of a routine process within the software – creating an invoice.

Innovation Suite 2011 in Berlin

Published date: August 22, 2011 в 3:00 am

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,,

SIT will hold its 7th Innovation Suite in Berlin, Germany from October 24-26, 2011.  Participants will learn the tools and principles of the SIT method step-by-step.  They will also learn how to implement an innovation program within their companies.  It is an intensive learning experience with some of SIT’s most experienced facilitators.

Here is what a participant had to say about it:


Agenda (from the SIT website):
Day 1 – Learn SIT to think and act differently
By 5:30pm you will know how to apply:
– SIT principles and thinking tools for New Product Development
– SIT’s approach to Problem Solving
Day 2 – SIT-in-action
The second day will be conducted mostly by SIT-trained innovation leaders from large organizations around the world.
By 5:30pm you will know how SIT works on different scales and levels of organizations after you have:
– Heard first-hand testimonials, challenges, and case-studies of innovation managers.
– Learned additional SIT tools from the experienced innovation leaders.
Day 3 – Putting it all to work
The third day is all about you and your team, and how to harness your team’s knowledge and resources to meet your business goals, improve the results of strategic projects, and find creative ways to use new thinking in everyday situations.
By 5:30pm you will know how to manage a short innovation process after you have:
– Learned how to identify needs and opportunities for innovation
– Led an innovation session on a real business topic of your own
– Learned what needs to be done to ensure results
After the program, participants will receive personal coaching to help apply the new skills in their organizations and implement an innovation program.

The LAB: Innovating a Corporate Training Program (July 2011)

Published date: July 25, 2011 в 3:00 am

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,,,

Lab_2
Corporate training is a $60 billion dollar industry and growing as the economy recovers.  As with any industry, significant changes are occurring.  Companies spend less on fixed internal resources and are outsourcing more.  Learners are changing in the way they learn, perhaps due to the generational shift.  And of course, technology has made the social side of learning more available and effective. Training executives, those who manage company training resources and programs, must continue to innovate to address these changes to stay relevant.

For this month’s LAB, we will apply the corporate innovation method, S.I.T., to a training program.  Our goal is to find new-to-the-world concepts that improve a company’s training efforts.  The method works by applying one of five innovation patterns to components within the training environment.  The pattern has the effect of morphing the component into something that seems unrecognizable or ambiguous.  We take that “virtual product” and work backwards to uncover potential benefits or markets served, a process called “Function Follows Form.”

Begin by listing the major components of a corporate training program:

  1. Trainees
  2. Faculty
  3. Classrooms
  4. Curriculum
  5. Lesson Plans
  6. Technology
  7. Customers (of the firm)
  8. Products (services) of the firm
  9. Learning management system (keeps track of courses, enrollments, etc)

Here are five ideas, each using one of the five S.I.T. innovation patterns:

Innovation Sighting: Attribute Dependency in an Exercise Bike

Pro-Form’s Le Tour de France Indoor Cycle lets users choose or create real-world routes, then adjusts the angle of the riding platform to replicate the experience of riding up and down those roads. This new product has three different features using the Attribute Dependency Tool of the corporate innovation method, SIT.

  • iFit Live:  With the iFit Live™ Technology Powered by Google Maps™ you can ride anywhere in the world! Choose from 24 pre-mapped courses or create your own. Ride over the Passage du Gois or climb the hills of Mont des Alouettes in France. Now you can experience these same trails and more on this Indoor Cycle. With iFit Live™ Technology you can ride where the Pro’s do. The world is at your fingertips. Map any route and enjoy the ride!
  • Incline/Decline:  Introducing incline and decline that matches the street! Now, you can experience any route around the world and Le Tour de France Indoor Cycle automatically adjusts the incline and decline to simulate the terrain! No matter the route, no matter the map, your bike moves to follow the road. So, you get a realistic workout-just as if you were outside-but without the traffic, potholes and weather. Now you can have the perfect day on your road bike every day of the year with Le Tour de France Indoor Cycle.
  • Intelligent Wind Resistance:  Any indoor bike can give you resistance-but only Le Tour de France Indoor Cycle can give you Intelligent Wind Resistance. Intelligent Wind Resistance automatically adjusts the resistance of your bike based on your wind profile. Our smart technology calculates your height and weight to apply the natural resistance you would get out on the road. A climb in your basement is exactly like a climb outside.

Wind Attribute Dependency differs from the other templates in that it uses attributes (variables) of the situation rather than components.  Start with an attribute list, then construct a 2 x 2 matrix of these, pairing each against the others.  Each cell represents a potential dependency (or potential break in an existing dependency) that forms a Virtual Product.  Using Function Follows Form, we work backwards and envision a potential benefit or problem that this hypothetical solution solves.  The Tour de France Indoor Cycle creates dependencies between rider preference, bicycle route, road elevation, and wind profile.

What caught my eye is the similarity of these ideas with those of my graduate students in my “Innovation Tools” course.  Using Systematic Inventive Thinking, they have to take a product category and apply the method to create completely new-to-the-world innovations.  For example, a group in my last class tackled the exercise equipment category with a focus on treadmills (see The LAB May 2011).

Compare these student’s ideas for treadmills with Pro-Form’s Le Tour de France Indoor Cycle.  Well done!

The LAB: Innovating Pharmaceuticals with S.I.T. (June 2011)

Published date: June 27, 2011 в 2:00 am

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,,

 PharmaBrand Summit 2011 kicks off in Montreux, Switzerland this week.  It will bring together senior executives and brand marketers from Europe’s largest pharmaceutical organizations.  This year’s theme is: “The arrogance of success is to think that what you did yesterday will be sufficient for tomorrow.” 

That is certainly an appropriate theme for many industries including pharmaceuticals.  These companies are in transition as many aspects of their business models are changing.  Of particular concern is the shrinking product pipeline.  The days of the billion-dollar blockbuster drugs seem to be gone.  So how will they create a new pipeline beyond traditional approaches and research methods?

Yoni Stern and Amnon Levav of S.I.T.  describe a unique approach using their innovation method to create new pharmaceuticals1.  The method is based on five patterns inherent in the majority of innovative products and services.  These patterns are like the DNA of products that can be extracted and applied systematically to create new products, including pharmaceuticals.  For this month’s LAB, here are two examples of their approach.

1.  Task Unification:  This technique takes one of the product’s components (or some object in the product’s immediate vicinity) and gives it an additional task without losing its original one.  Imagine you wanted to improve breast cancer testing.  One of the components in the vicinity of the problem is fatty acids.  Tumor cells accumulate fatty acids much more than noncancerous cells do.  To take advantage of this, a new drug product is conceived by chemically linking paclitaxel, a widely used anticancer agent, to DHA, a natural fatty acid present in breast milk.  The fatty acid is given the additional “job” of delivering the cancer fighting agent.  This approach delivers a more therapeutic concentration in tumor cells for longer periods of time than would be possible without the fatty acid. As often happens when using the task unification pattern, the same factor that was formerly assisting the cancer to proliferate is now contributing to its destruction.

2.  Division:  The Division technique works by dividing a product in one of three ways: physical, functional, or preserving (where each part preserves the characteristics of the whole).  Rochester, N.Y.-based Vaccinex developed a technology based on this technique.  They separated immunoglobulin heavy-chain genes from light-chain genes during the drug discovery process.  As the recombinant vector particles replicate, the chains are assembled into membrane antibody receptors. The antigen is then added to the culture and binds to the matching antibody receptors of a particular cell. The cell is selected, and the recombinant vector is extracted. This division approach of separating heavy chains from light chains allows researchers to rearrange them to produce new combinations.

Drug discovery How do you begin using the SIT method in a clinical environment?  Start by listing the components of a current drug or diagnostic used in a disease of interest.  Also list the surrounding clinical structures and components in the vicinity.  For example, a company that develops products to treat dermatological diseases such as acne might begin with a list of the current product’s ingredients: benzoyl peroxide, alcohol, glycerin, etc., as well its immediate environment (e.g., the acne): sebum, Propionibacterium acnes, porphyrins, hair, and skin.  Next, apply one of the SIT thinking tool such Task Unification and look for non-obvious combinations of tasks and components to create hypothetical drug “solutions.”  Work backwards from these solutions to identify any real or potential benefits that it might deliver in the clinical care or drug discovery process.

1Stern, Yoni, and Amnon Levav. “The DNA of Ideas”. BIO-IT WORLD April 2005: 56-57.

Innovation Resolution

Published date: June 13, 2011 в 3:00 am

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,,,

“The level of abstraction determines a group’s ability to move between strategies and tactics.  Too high, and the group becomes lost in the detail; too low, and the group is unable to effectively navigate.”

Stuart Morgan
Director of Industrial Design
Johnson & Johnson

My friend and former J&J colleague, Stuart Morgan, is one of those rare people who can flex between the highest level of abstraction and the smallest details of any particular problem.  He is a whiz, and it is hard to keep up with him.  For innovators and innovation managers, this is a skill worth developing and adding to your company’s innovation competency model.  Here’s why.

To be most successful at applying an innovation method, a team needs to determine the right level of granularity over the problem.  Selecting different levels of innovation resolution will yield completely different innovative opportunities.  Changing the resolution could yield interesting new adjacent market spaces.  The level you target will also affect how you use an innovation method like S.I.T..

Here is an example.  Suppose you designed and manufactured commercial aircraft.  The natural starting point would be to innovate an airplane.  At this level of resolution, our initial component list might be:

  1. cockpit
  2. fuselage
  3. wings
  4. fuel tanks
  5. rudder
  6. elevator
  7. landing gear
  8. etc…

The LAB: Innovating the Treadmill with S.I.T. (May 2011)

Published date: May 30, 2011 в 3:00 am

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,,,

 In 1817, Sir William Cubitt innovated the treadmill as a method of reforming prison convicts who got out of line.  Today, that “torture” continues.  According to the Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association, fifty million Americans use a treadmill.  Sales of treadmills are $1 billion annually of the total $4 billion fitness equipment industry.  For this month’s LAB, we will use the corporate innovation method, S.I.T., to create new-to-the-world concepts for the ubiquitous treadmill.

S.I.T. works by taking one of five patterns (subtraction, task unification, division, multiplication, and attribute dependency) and applying it to an existing product or service.  This morphs it into a “virtual product,” which is an abstract, ambiguous notion with no clear purpose.  We then work backwards (Function Follows Form) to find new and useful benefits or markets for the virtual product.

Here are four innovations created by students at the University of Cincinnati as part of the innovation tools course.  They articulated these ideas in a dream catalog, a hypothetical, futuristic catalog that merges marketing insight with innovative design.  You can download it here.

Treadmill 1.  Extreme Runner:  The Extreme Runner provides the ultimate workout for the  athlete or experienced runner who loves a challenge. This special treadmill can provide an intense and unique training session or it can be used for extreme competitions.

  • Alternating Elevation Width Belt- instead of the tread staying the same width throughout the course of a workout, this treadmill challenges the walker or runner by correlating the width of the tread to the height of the treadmill. By starting out wide when flat, then getting smaller when the user decides to elevate the machine, this treadmill gives the feel of a rock climb or mountain hike in a matter of minutes.
  • SIT Tools Used: Attribute Dependency – creating a dependency between the width of the belt and the elevation of the machine; the belt speed and the price of the machine; and the time on the track and the position of the runner on the machine.

Innovation Sighting: Street Art Without the Paint

Published date: May 23, 2011 в 3:00 am

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,,,,,

Here is a nice example of the Subtraction tool of the corporate innovation method, S.I.T..  Imagine painting a picture without the paint. From PSFK:

From metal to billboards, Portuguese artist Alexandre Farto aka Vhils is regarded for his work across a variety of mediums. However, his “Scratching the Surface” style (which we first noticed here) is particularly remarkable. Using decrepit city walls as his canvas, the artist carved faces from the concrete, unmasking the beauty inherent to even the most neglected spaces.

To use Subtraction, start by listing the components of the situation, product, service, process, etc.  (The method works with just about anything that can be conceptualized into components).  In this case, the innovator (artist) would create a list like this:

  1. canvas
  2. paint
  3. pallet
  4. brush
  5. subject
  6. model

Alexandre-Farto-aka-Vhils-Wall-Mural-575x430-525x392 The next step is to subtract a component, preferably something that seems to be essential to the original item.  In this case, removing the paint creates our “virtual product” – an abstract, ambiguous configuration that results from applying one of the five S.I.T. patterns.  Then we imagine the benefits, potential customers, and needs addressed by the virtual product.

The Subtraction tool is a great starting point for innovation sessions because it helps confront the fixedness we all have about the world around us.  A painting without paint certainly fits that description.

To extend the idea, try using the other patterns.  For example, Task Unification assigns an additional job to an existing resource.  To use Task Unification, list both the internal and external components within the Closed World (an imaginary space and time around the situation).  Then select a component randomly and give it a “job” related to your paining.  In the works by Vihils, for example, we might take a component of the building and use it as a part of the facial features.  Or, we might give people on the street the additional “job” of adding details to the picture.

To use Attribute Dependency, we imagine creating a correlation between internal attributes of the painting with external attributes of the environment around the painting.  Simply said, as one thing changes, another thing changes.  For example, when it rains, imagine how the Vihils painting might change.  Perhaps it changes color, or shape, or theme.  Perhaps the change is related to moisture such as wet tears flowing from the subject’s eyes.  It is these additional innovations, especially ones that draw from the Closed World, that create that extra element of surprise – “Gee, I never would have thought of that!”

 

Feature Creep

Published date: May 2, 2011 в 3:00 am

Written by:

Category: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,,,,

Companies that struggle with innovation often make up for it by adding features to existing products.  They succumb to “feature creep” – the gradual and continuous addition of features and functions though nothing is truly new.  While it may look improved, the added features make your product more complex, difficult to use, and more costly to produce.  Over time, your core customers abandon you.

Here is an example – the Numi toilet by Kohler.  At $6400, it is promoted as the top-of-the-line toilet with lots of high-tech bells and whistles:

  • Custom bidet: User can control pressure, temperature and angle.
  • Tankless design; dual flush
  • Motion Sensor Lid: After 90 seconds of no movement, the toilet will close.
  • Seat warmer
  • Foot warmer: A vent beneath the bowl blows hot air to warm your feet and the cold tile beneath them.
  • Automatic seat: For male users, a motion sensor is activated by foot and causes the seat to rise and then lower when you’re away.
  • LED lit back panel: Frosted glass is lit in an energy-efficient way.
  • MP3 hook-up: So you never have to be without your music.
  • Remote control: This touch-screen pad lets the user control all of these features from a wireless control.
  • A flat white surface designed for easy cleaning.

Instead of adding features, companies can become more innovative by subtracting features.  Here is an example of the Subtraction template of the S.I.T. innovation method.  Kimberly-Clarke Corporation, a global producer of paper-based products, launched their new Scott Natural Tube-Free toilet paper. Just as the name asserts, the rolls come without the cardboard tubes while still being able to fit on the average toilet paper holder.

From Foxnews.com:

“The idea has been around for quite some time,” said Doug Daniels, brand manger for Scott brand. “The tube doesn’t really serve any consumer purpose. But we’ve had a breakthrough in our technology that’s finally allowed us to do this.”  For now, the process of taking out the tube remains a mystery, as Kimberly-Clarke won’t reveal its ground-breaking technology. Daniels says they’re keeping tight-lipped, since they might use the process for future products. But more importantly, he maintains that no cardboard tube means every single piece of toilet paper will be usable, without those last few sheets getting stuck to the roll.

Kimberly-Clarke estimates that the U.S. alone disposes of 17 billion cardboard tubes from bathroom tissue, equating to 160 million pounds of waste. To put that into perspective, that’s roughly the weight of 250 Boeing 747s and enough tubes to circle the earth’s equator 40 times. Daniels says that this marriage of consumer and ecological advantages will pave the way for the success of the tubeless initiative.”

Get our innovation model that has worked for 1000+ companies.

    No thanks, not now.